skip to main | skip to sidebar

Movie or Hot Chick?

The void left by Ebert's health difficulties (may he recover fully) must be filled, and this is our humble attempt to fill it. Hidden amidst a tangle of film-related bloviating and nonsense, we will review some movies. The question we will answer is primitive, but cuts to the quick: would we rather have spent the time watching the movie or with a hot chick?

Friday, January 12, 2007

In the theaters: "Children of Men" - Dave says: Movie

Regular people in a scary, uncertain situation and I felt what they were feeling and I cared. Then after the movie, I had emotional aftermath. F-in' A, movie.
Posted by Erasmus Brock at 10:58 PM

1 comment:

Tiberius Jones said...

Far be it from me to request that you be more forthcoming and less cryptic, but that movie review kinda sounds like a Bush press conference.

2:45 PM

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (12)
    • ▼  January (12)
      • What we have here is failure to communicate.
      • Dave's reviewing philosophy
      • Leave the cannoli.
      • In the theaters: "Children of Men" - Dave says: Movie
      • What did Miggs say to you?
      • Wrong Reviews
      • Or whether we both see the color orange the same way.
      • "If you spent as much time as you do posting on th...
      • Tell us again about Paris, 1968.
      • Jim Emerson can suck a fuck.
      • A disgrace, all of you.
      • In the theaters: "Pan's Labyrinth" - Dave says: Ho...

Links

  • NY's message from Ebert
  • Roger writes to readers about his health
  • rogerebert.com
  • Rotten Tomatoes - Don't know which critic to listen to? Heck, listen to 'em all.
  • Hard Boiled Cinema (our own film series, currently lovingly curated by Tiberius)
  • Great Movies by Tiberius Jones

Contributors

  • Erasmus Brock
  • Tiberius Jones