The void left by Ebert's health difficulties (may he recover fully) must be filled, and this is our humble attempt to fill it. Hidden amidst a tangle of film-related bloviating and nonsense, we will review some movies. The question we will answer is primitive, but cuts to the quick: would we rather have spent the time watching the movie or with a hot chick?
Monday, January 08, 2007
Jim Emerson can suck a fuck.
Hate that guy. His writing style is like a case study in masturbatory disregard for the reader. Which would be fine, and even amusing, were he openly contemptuous of the audience. But he's not nearly so interesting.
Speaking of masturbatory disregard for the reader, a point of clarification: Jim Emerson is the editor of rogerebert.com, and is writing in Ebert's place while good ol' Rog (may he recover fully) is in casualty.
2 comments:
Speaking of masturbatory disregard for the reader, a point of clarification: Jim Emerson is the editor of rogerebert.com, and is writing in Ebert's place while good ol' Rog (may he recover fully) is in casualty.
What is this, Good Critic/Bad Critic?
Post a Comment